Each “Analyze an Argument” essay will likely to be scored on a 6-point holistic scale according towards the criteria below.

1 september 2019

Each “Analyze an Argument” essay will likely to be scored on a 6-point holistic scale according towards the criteria below.

Although the GRE ® Analytical Writing measure contains two discrete analytical writing tasks, just one combined score is reported since it is more reliable than either task score alone. The score reported will represent the common of this scores when it comes to two tasks.

Score of 6 Outstanding

A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique associated with the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.

A paper that is typical this category:

  • clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
  • develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically and connects these with clear transitions
  • effectively supports the key points of the critique
  • demonstrates control of language, including word that is appropriate and sentence variety
  • demonstrates facility utilizing the conventions (for example., grammar, usage and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors

Score of 5 Strong

A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed critique of this argument and conveys meaning clearly.

A paper that is typical this category:

  • clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them in a way that is generally perceptive
  • develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically and connects these with appropriate transitions
  • sensibly supports the primary points for the critique
  • demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety
  • demonstrates facility with all the conventions of standard written English, but could have minor errors

Score of 4 Adequate

A 4 paper presents a critique that is competent of argument and conveys meaning adequately.

A typical does eliteessaywriters.com/write-my-paper work paper in this category:

  • identifies and analyzes important popular features of the argument
  • develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily, but may well not connect these with transitions
  • supports the main points of this critique
  • Demonstrates control that is sufficient of to express ideas with reasonable clarity
  • generally demonstrates control over the conventions of standard written English, but may have some errors

Score of 3 Limited

A 3 paper demonstrates some competence with its critique of the argument as well as in conveying meaning, but is obviously flawed.

A paper that is typical this category exhibits one or more associated with the following characteristics:

  • does not identify or analyze almost all of the important top features of the argument, though some analysis of this argument is present
  • mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly
  • is limited in the development that is logical organization of ideas
  • Offers support of little value and relevance for points associated with critique
  • lacks clarity in expressing ideas
  • contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that will interfere with meaning

Score of 2 Seriously Flawed

A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing.

A paper that is typical this category exhibits a number of associated with the following characteristics:

  • will not present a critique predicated on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer’s own views about the subject
  • will not develop ideas or perhaps is disorganized and illogical
  • provides little if any relevant or reasonable support
  • Has problems that are serious making use of language plus in sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
  • contains serious errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that frequently meaning that is obscure

Score of 1 Fundamentally Deficient

A 1 paper demonstrates deficiencies that are fundamental analytical writing.

A paper that is typical this category exhibits one or more associated with the following characteristics:

  • provides little if any proof of the capability to understand and analyze the argument
  • provides little or no evidence of the capacity to develop an organized response
  • Has problems that are severe language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
  • Contains errors that are pervasive grammar, usage or mechanics that lead to incoherence

About